MITIGATING STRESS DURING WORKFORCE MOBILIZATION IN ARMED CONFLICT

V.V. Kalnysh, B.S. Bozhuk

Full article (PDF), UKR

Introduction.

Ensuring the psychosocial well-being of the working population during wartime is a critical responsibility of the state, particularly in the context of mobilization. However, due to the prolonged absence of large-scale wars in modern history, comprehensive strategies for addressing this issue remain underdeveloped. This gap makes the development of effective measures in Ukraine both relevant and timely.

Purpose.

This study aims to propose a set of psychosocial measures to enhance readiness, reduce stress, and increase motivation among the working population for mobilization into the armed forces during active military conflicts.

Materials and methods.

The study employs a systematic analysis of modern approaches to psychosocial support during mobilization, incorporating principles from complex systems theory. It reviews both domestic and international literature to identify existing gaps and effective strategies.

Research results.

A review of current research highlights a lack of detailed strategies for stabilizing the psychosocial state of the mobilized workforce. While extensive literature focuses on
psychological support for active military personnel and the growing presence of women in the armed forces, strategies for mitigating mobilization-related stress among the general workforce remain underexplored. This study outlines key objectives for supporting the working population during mobilization, identifies methods for stabilizing their psychological state, and proposes specific interventions. A structured approach to implementing these strategies is also detailed.

Conclusions.

The findings reveal that both domestic and international literature primarily address stress reduction for active military personnel rather than the broader working population undergoing mobilization. The study emphasizes the importance of considering age and gender factors when designing interventions to reduce stress and improve overall resilience. It presents targeted strategies, techniques, and methodologies for stabilizing and supporting the workforce during mobilization.

Keywords: workforce mobilization, psychosocial support, stress reduction, military personnel, gender considerations, psychological resilience, wartime readiness

Referenсes

1. Kokun OM, Moroz VM, Pishko IO, Lozinska NS. [Formation of psychological readiness of military personnel of military service under contract to perform assigned tasks during combat coordination: a methodological manual]. Kyiv: SE NDC GZS MES Ukraine 2021. 156 p. Ukrainian.
2. Nikitenko H. [Research of internal and external factors of psychological readiness of mobilized servicemen to military serve by using the questionnaire]. Scientific Proceedings of Ostroh Academy National University. Psychology Series. 2018;7:64-71. Ukrainian. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25264/2415-7384-2018-7-64-71.
3. Oros MM. [The effect of war on people. Psyche and character changes under war conditions]. Ukrainian Medical Journal. 2023;(2):93-7. Ukrainian. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32471/umj.1680-3051.154.241952.
4. Gorban GO. [Theoretical model of psychological readiness of a person for decision-making]. Journal of Modern Psychology. 2023;(2):23-34. Ukrainian. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26661/2310-4368/2023-2-3.
5. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. NewYork: W.H. Freeman; 1997.
6. Lazarus RS, Folkman S. Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. NewYork: Springer; 1984.
7. Shay J. Achilles in Vietnam: Combat trauma and the undoing of character. NewYork: Scribner; 1994.
8. Bartone P. T. Hardiness protects against war-related stress in Army Reserve forces. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practiceand Research. 1999;51(2):72-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/1061-4087.51.2.72.
9. Zimbardo PG. The Lucifer Effect: Under standing How Good People Turn Evil. New York: Random House; 2007.
10. McEwen BS, Gianaros PJ. Central role of the brain in stress and adaptation: Links to socioeconomic status, health, and disease. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2010;1186(1):190-222. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05331.x.
11. Matthews MD. Head Strong: How Psychology is Revolutionizing War. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014.
12. Duckworth AL. Grit: The Power of Passion and Perseverance. NewYork: Scribner; 2016.
13. Kokun OM, Klochkov VV, Moroz VM, Pishko IO, Lozinska NS. [Ensuring the psychological stability of military personnel in combat conditions: a methodological manual]. Kyiv: Center for Educational Literature, 2023. 146 p. Ukrainian.
14. Arnautova V, Lukichov V, Nikityuk T. [Guide book on Gender Integration in the Ukrainian Armed Forces]. Kyiv: Ministry of Defense of Ukraine; 2020. 304 p. Ukrainian.
15. Sandhoff M, Rieger SM, Igielnik R. Women in the U.S. Military: Growing Share, Distinctive Profile. Pew Research Center [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2024 Dec 21]. Available
from: https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2011/12/22/women-in-the-u-s-military-
growing-share-distinctive-profile/?gad_source=1&gclid=EAIaIQobChMIxNDx3NOMjAMVCguiAx1asiwSEAAYASAAEgIfWPD_BwE.
16. Woodward R, Mitra-Kahn T. Gender and the Military: Women in the Armed Forces in the 21st Century. In: Caforio G, Nuciari M, editors. Routledge Handbook of Military Studies. 2018. p. 177-89.
17. Carreiras H. Gender and Civil-Military Relations: The Role of Women in Armed Forces. In: Heathcote S, Otto D, editors. Women in the Military and in Armed Conflict. 2016. p. 25-42.
18. Shields P., Snider DM. Integrating Women into Combat Roles: Ethical and Practical Challenges. Journal of Military Ethics. 2014;13(2):105-23.

19. Matthews M, Schnyer DM. The Role of Human Performance Optimization in Enhancing Resilience of Military Personnel. In: Laurence JH, Matthews MD, editors. The Oxford Hand book of Military Psychology. Oxford University Press; 2017. p. 221-36.