You are using an outdated browser. For a faster, safer browsing experience, upgrade for free today.

Visual strain among office workers in the digital age

ISSN 2223-6775 Ukrainian journal of occupational health Vol.20, No 4, 2024

https://doi.org/10.33573/ujoh2024.04.311

Visual strain among office workers in the digital age

PrudyusV.V.

State University "Institute of Occupational Medicine named after Yu.I. Kundiyev National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine", Kyiv

Introduction:

The digitalization of society has significantly transformed the modern workplace, with over 60% of employees in developed countries using computers daily. While this shift has enhanced work efficiency, it has also introduced new challenges in occupational medicine, particularly due to the increasing prevalence of Computer Vision Syndrome (CVS). According to the American Optometric Association, CVS – also known as digital eye strain – encompasses a range of eye and vision problems caused by prolonged use of digital screens, including computers, tablets, e-readers, and smartphones. Nearly 70% of office workers who spend more than six hours per day on screens experience CVS symptoms, leading to reduced productivity and increased stress. The primary risk factors include extended screen exposure without proper ergonomics. The widespread adoption of remote work has further intensified these challenges, making visual strain a critical concern in occupational health.

The purpose of the Study

This study aims to examine the prevalence of Computer Vision Syndrome among office workers and assess the effectiveness of preventive measures in reducing its symptoms.

Materials and Methods:

The study was conducted among office workers who spend at least six hours per day on digital screens. The primary data collection tool was the Computer Vision Syndrome Questionnaire (CVS-Q). The research was carried out in two phases. The first stage measured the prevalence and severity of CVS symptoms among workers. On a second stage workers were provided with preventive recommendations, and a follow-up survey was conducted four weeks later to assess the impact of these measures. Quantitative analysis was used to compare the results of the initial and follow-up assessments.

Results:

The initial survey revealed an average CVS-Q score of 9.75 among participants, with all respondents (100%) scoring 6 or higher, confirming the presence of CVS. After four weeks of following the recommended preventive measures, there was a significant reduction in symptoms. The proportion of workers with a CVS-Q score ≥6 decreased from 100% (18 workers) to 16% (3 workers). Additionally, the average CVS-Q score dropped nearly by half, from 9.75 to 4.5 points. These findings demonstrate the effectiveness of preventive interventions and high compliance among workers in mitigating the symptoms of Computer Vision Syndrome.

Conclusions:

: 1. Digitalization has significantly increased visual strain among office workers, contributing to the widespread occurrence of Computer Vision Syndrome. 2. CVS negatively impacts productivity by reducing concentration, slowing task completion, and increasing errors, leading to economic losses for businesses. 3. A comprehensive approach to prevention and management – including workplace ergonomics, screen breaks, and awareness programs – can effectively reduce symptoms and improve workers’ quality of life. 4. Implementing preventive programs at the enterprise level is essential, along with further research to refine and optimize existing recommendations.

Keywords: digitalization, computer vision syndrome, visual strain, occupational health.

References

  1. International Labour Organization. The Future of Work in a Digital Economy. ILO: Geneva; 2020. 30 p.
  2. . Gowrisankaran S, Sheedy JE, Albin TJ. Computer vision syndrome: A review. WORK. 2015;52(2):303-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-152162
  3. Cantó-Sancho N, Porru S, Casati S, Ronda E, Seguí-Crespo M, Carta A. Prevalence and risk factors of computer vision syndrome-assessed in office workers by a validated questionnaire. PeerJ. 2023 Mar 3;11:e14937. DOI: http://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.14937
  4. Ma’roef VX, Adriyani R, Putra IWG. Risk Factors of Computer Vision Syndrome: A Review of Ocular Causes Among School and College Students. Jurnal Kesehatan Lingkungan. 2023;15(1):1-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20473/jkl.v15i1.2023.1-15
  5. Issa R, Sfeir M, Azzi V, Salameh P, Akiki M, Akel M, Hallit S, Obeid S, Malaeb D, Hallit R. Association of Computer Vision Syndrome with Depression/Anxiety among Lebanese Young Adults: The Mediating Effect of Stress. Healthcare . 2023 Oct 2;11(19):2674. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11192674
  6. Kudlai VH. [Modern Trends in Labor Market Development in the Context of Digitalization]. In: Economic Development and Business Administration: Scientific Trends and Solutions: Proceedings of the 2nd International Scientific and Practical Conference; 2021 Oct 21; Kyiv. Kyiv: NAU; 2021. Vol. 1. p. 65-6. Ukrainian.
  7. Seguí M, Cabrero-García J, Crespo A, Verdú J, Ronda E. A Reliable and Valid Questionnaire Was Developed to Measure Computer Vision Syndrome at the Workplace. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2015;68(6):662-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.01.015
  8. Rykov SO, Varyvonchyk DV, Hudz OV. [Computer Vision Syndrome]. Kyiv: Zdorov'ya; 2005.128 p. Ukrainian.