You are using an outdated browser. For a faster, safer browsing experience, upgrade for free today.

Adhesive Compounds as Chemical Hazard Factors in the Footwear Industry

ISSN 2223-6775 Ukrainian journal of occupational health Vol.20, No 4, 2024

https://doi.org/10.33573/ujoh2024.04.291

Adhesive Compounds as Chemical Hazard Factors in the Footwear Industry

Lototska-Dudyk U.B., Kuzminov B.P.

Danylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University, Ukraine

Introduction:

The extensive use of adhesive compounds at various stages of shoe manufacturing, combined with the diversity of their chemical components, necessitates monitoring these substances in workplaces to evaluate potential risks to the health of industry workers. This study aims to assess the occupational exposure and associated risks linked to adhesive compounds in the footwear industry.

Aim of the Research

To analyze the composition of primary adhesives used in shoe manufacturing and evaluate the working conditions of employees by measuring the levels of adhesive components in workplace air.

Materials and Methods:

A total of 1,335 measurements of chemical substances were conducted at the workplaces of key footwear industry professions, including shapers of blanks, lasters, and shoe assemblers, who are in frequent contact with adhesives.

Results:

The footwear industry utilizes various types of adhesives, including adhesive solutions (polyurethane, polychloroprene), adhesive dispersions (butadiene-styrene, chloroprene), hot-melt adhesives (polyamide, polyester), and adhesives based on ethylene and vinyl acetate copolymers. The structural components of these adhesives belong to different hazard classes, posing health risks primarily through inhalation and skin contamination. While the majority of chemical concentrations in workplace air were within permissible limits, specific instances of exceeding hygienic standards were identified: ethyl acetate (15.0%) and toluene (7.7%) during manual application of polyurethane (Bonicol PUR) and polychloroprene (Boterm GTA) adhesives at the blank-forming stage; gasoline (26.7%) during halogenation of soles and use of adhesive solutions; chloroprene (10.0%) when applying chloroprene latex during blank tightening; phenol (18.8%) during shoe assembly involving adhesive solutions and dispersions; formaldehyde (16.7%) during the use of hot-melt polyester adhesives in blank-tightening operations.

Conclusions:

The work conditions of adhesive operators in the procurement department are classified as: Permissible (Class 2) with latex adhesives; Harmful (Class 3.1) with polychloroprene and polyurethane adhesive solutions, chloroprene dispersions; Harmful (Class 3.4) with hot-melt polyester adhesives. In assembly workshops, conditions ranged from permissible (Class 2) to harmful (Class 3.1) when using two-component adhesive solutions. These findings serve as a scientific foundation for assessing the health risks of workers exposed to adhesive compounds and guide the development of measures to optimize working conditions in the footwear industry.

Keywords: footwear industry, work conditions, adhesive solutions, adhesive dispersions, hot-melt adhesives, workplace air, chemical hazard.

References

  1. Paiva RM, Marques EA, da Silva LF, et al. Adhesives in the footwear industry. Proceedings of the institution of mechanical engineers, part L: Journal of materials: design and applications. 2016;230(2):357-74. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464420715602441.
  2. Savira YM, Tejamaya MB, Putri AA. A case study: сhemical health risk assessment in three footwear small industries in Bogor-Indonesia year 2019. Gaceta Sanitaria. 2021; 35(2):374-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2021.10.054
  3. Kuzminov BP, Lototska-Dudyk UB. [Occupational factors and their influence on the health of workers of shoe productions]. Ukrainian journal of occupational health. 2016;1(46):74-83. doi.org/10.33573/ujoh2016.01.074. Ukrainian.
  4. Orgilés-Calpena E, Arán-Aís F, Torró-Palau AM, et al. Adhesives in the footwear industry: a critical review. Adhesion adhesives. 2019;7(1):69-91. doi:10.7569/RAA.2019.097303.
  5. Rudawska A. Adhesives applications and properties. Lublin, 2016:219-35. PRINT ISBN: 978-953-51-2783-3; ISBN978-953-51-2784-0; doi: 10.5772 /62603.
  6. Simões CL, Aguiar A, Marques AC, et al. Environmental assessment of an innovative adhesive for the footwear industry: road map for product development. The international journal of life cycle assessment. 2024; 29:1264-78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-024-02314-w.
  7. Todd LA, Mottus K, Mihlan GJ. A survey of airborne and skin exposures to chemicals in footwear and equipment factories in Thailand. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2008; 5(3):169-81. https://doi.org/10.1080/15459620701853342.
  8. Barry CP, Morose GJ, Begin K, et al. The identification and screening of lower toxicity solvents for contact adhesives. International journal of adhesion and adhesives. 2017;78:174-81.
  9. Foà V, Martinotti I. [Shoe factory workers, solvents and health]. G Ital Med Lav Ergon. 2012;34(1):16-8. PMID: 22697025. Italian.
  10. Gianoli E, Brusoni D, Cornaggia N. [Technology upgrades and exposure to chemical agents: results of the PPTP study in the footwear industry]. G Ital Med Lav Ergon. 2012; 34(1):37-42. PMID: 22697030. Italian.
  11. Domanski W, Makles Z. Zagrozenia substsancjami chemicznymi podchas prac z klejami rozpuszczalnikowymi. Medicina pracy. 2012;63(1):31-8.
  12. Bosson-Rieutort D, Sarazin P, Bicout DJ, et al. Occupational co-exposures to multiple chemical agents from workplace measurements by the us occupational safety and health administration. Annals of work exposures and health. 2020; 30:64(4):402-15. https://doi.org/10.1093/annweh/wxaa008
  13. Lototska-Dudyk UB. [Research of the assortment of shoes glues and their components as potential harmful factors of the production environment of footwear industry]. Aktualni problemy profilaktychnoi medytsyny. 2020;20:151-61. Ukrainian.
  14. Morgachova VI, Kondacova LG, Dzigal NO, et al. [Work conditions and health of workers in shoe production]. Ukrainian journal of occupational health. 2007; 2(10):31-40. Russian.
  15. Varyvonchyk DV. [Assessment of production cancer danger in the processing branch of industry]. Ukrainian journal of occupational health. 2013;2(35):22-37. Ukrainian.